Attacks on Places of Religious Worship in Post–War Sri Lanka

8th March 2013, Colombo, Sri Lanka: While the post-war context offered an opportunity for consolidating peace and reconciliation, and there have been a number of positive developments, there are increasing concerns relating to violence targeting places of worship and religious intolerance. Since the end of the war there have been high-profile incidents such as the attack on the Mosque in Dambulla in April 2012, however other incidents, have received little or no public and media attention. This has resulted in a limited understanding of the scale and nature of these incidents.

This report documents incidents of attacks on places of worship in Sri Lanka since the end of the war in May 2009 and discusses the broader context of such attacks. The report lists 65 cases of attacks on religious places of worship between May 2009 and January 2013. Direct attacks have been reported from all provinces of Sri Lanka, making clear that the threat is not restricted to particular areas. Most of the reported incidents were from the Western province (16), followed by the Eastern province (12), the Southern province (11) and the North-Western province (9).

Although the list cannot claim to be comprehensive, it offers a starting point to document attacks against places of worship of the four main religions practiced in the country. The lack of coverage by the media and other civil society groups, lack of consistent documentation by religious groups, and the cautiousness of religious and civil society groups to engage on this issue were key obstacles in the compiling of this list. This report attempts to address this information gap so as to provide a more comprehensive picture of the ground situation and thereby raise public awareness and increase the understanding of policy makers on this issue.

While the numbers do provide some sense of the scale of the violence, it is important to make distinctions in terms of the nature of violence in each of these incidents. The majority of these cases are against Christian places of worship, mostly against non-traditional churches and there are also a number of attacks on Muslim places of worship. The 65 attacks can be categorized into three main types: inter-communal attacks, intra-religious violence, and robbery.

In terms of inter-communal attacks the bulk of incidents where perpetrators have been identified, are instances of Sinhala Buddhist attacks on other religious communities’ places of worship. While in the majority of incidents the perpetrators have not been prosecuted and in a number of cases are unidentified, in others there are allegations against groups and individuals who are believed to be responsible. A significant proportion of the attacks incidents relating to Buddhist and Hindu religious places are cases of theft and vandalism. There have also been several incidents of intra-religious violence between denominations of all the religious communities apart from the Hindu community.

While a number of the incidents appear to be isolated, in a number of cases it is evident that the attacks on an individual religious place is sometimes preceded by other forms of violence, threats and intimidation against a religious community in a specific area. The report attempts to include some of these incidents, including violence against clergy, protests against religious practices and hate speech, in order to provide a context to the attacks. The continuing acts of violence against places of religious worship coupled with a culture of intolerance are threatening to undermine efforts to consolidate peace, emphasising the need for immediate action by all actors, especially the Government.

Download the full report from here. You can also read it online here.

Download the report in Sinhala here.

Download the report in Tamil here.

The Centre for Policy Alternatives Vs. Attorney General SC SD 3/2013

The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and its Executive Director challenged the provisions of the Fiscal Management (Responsibility) (Amendment) Bill which was placed on the order paper of Parliament on the 8th of March 2013. The Fiscal Management Responsibility Act was passed in 2003 with the objective to reduce government debt to “prudent levels” and to manage the financial risk faced by the State.

The proposed amendment increases the permissible levels of Government guarantees for borrowing (obtained by State and non-State institutions) and thereby increases the financial risk faced by the country over a period of time. Furthermore the proposed amendment authorises the increase of the permitted level of total liabilities of the Government from the 60% of the estimated gross domestic product (GDP) for the financial year to 85% at the end of the financial year commencing on the 1st of January 2013. In addition the government will be able to maintain government debt to GDP as a percentage of GDP at 80% up until the 31st of December 2020 whereas under the original Act it was meant to be reduced to 60%. This would mean that, if the amendment is enacted, the government would not be compelled to implement strategies to reduce its debt over the next decade.

In accordance with the Constitution, the Parliament is mandated to ensure full control over public finance. However neither the loans obtained or guarantees given on borrowings are individually authorized by Parliament. CPA is concerned that the proposed amendment is part of a continued effort to reduce Parliamentary oversight over public finance which is essential to promote accountability, transparency in the manner in which tax payer money is spent and could have a detrimental effect on future generations.  CPA has on several occasions in the past challenged Bills of Parliament which if enacted would result in Parliament losing full control over public finance (CPA challenged the Appropriation Bill in 2007 and 2012 on this basis). The Supreme Court listed the matter for hearing on 21st and 22nd March 2013. The Supreme Court held that the bill is not inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution. The bill was passed by Parliament.

Guide to UN HRC Resolution on Sri Lanka (March 2013)

In the lead up to the 22nd Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UN HRC) from February 25th to March 22nd 2013 there is significant reference in the media and public spaces to the Resolution on Sri Lanka which was passed at the UN HRC in March 2012. Nonetheless, there is limited awareness as to the actual content of this Resolution. CPA has put out this guide in order to provide an explanation on the Resolution and developments related to it.

Download the PDF here.

Or read below.

Also available in Tamil and Sinhala.

Language and Humanity

Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 7.54.01 AM

We were embroiled in a devastating war for thirty long years. Our habit of not honouring the Tamil Language deems to be the cause for such war. At the beginning , due to the suppression of demands, demonstrations and agitations, the resolving of the problem was assigned to gun powder. Through this, we have destroyed the human, material and intellectual resources which belonged to all races of our country is an unusual way. But the worst of all is that we have eliminated our humanity.

The war has ceased. But the causes for eruption of war has not ceased. Hence, at least the necessary wisdom should now prevail. As an initial and a sustainable step, Sinhala and Tamil languages should be treated in an equal and justifiable manner. I think that this booklet will provide the necessary guidance in this regard.

My highest regards are due to Mr. Lional Guruge of the Community Participation Programme Division, Centre for Policy Alternatives who encouraged me in this endeavour.

S.G.Punchihewa

###

Download the book here.

Tamil Language Rights in Sri Lanka

Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 7.51.26 AM

After my schooling in Jaffna and Colombo and my under graduate studies in Colombo, I was recruited to the Ceylon Civil Service in April 1959, not long after Sinhala was made the only Official Language. I retired in April 1995, a few years after the passage of the 13th and 16th Ammendments to the Constitution, which introduced Tamil also as an Official Language. In the intervening 36 years, I served a total of 11 years in Badulla, Mannar, Batticaloa and Jaffna Districts. Badulla was bilingual but the other three Districts were predominently Tamil Speaking.

In the course my work I became very much aware and sensitive to the language problems of the people. This little monograph is the outcome of the awareness I gained in the course of my duties and subsequent research.

I have often travelled in the hill country and past Haputale Church with a lovely view, sometimes stretching out south to the Indian Ocean. That Churchyard contains the ashes of W.S. Senior whose haunting verses titled The Call of Lanka are included in this monograph.

I wish to gratefully acknowledge the help given in different ways by Lionel Guruge, Asoka Herath, Kamaladevi Sasichandran & Lanka Nesiah to bring out this monograph. My special thanks are due to the Editor of The Island who published a series of four articles by me on this subject in the course of March 2012. This monograph is based on those articles.

Devanesan Nesiah
April 2012

###

Download the publication here.

Note on the Divineguma Bill

Media reports in December 2012 indicated that the Divineguma Bill (referred to here as the Bill) is to be taken up for a vote by Parliament in January 2013. This note has been prepared by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA),with the objective of raising key issues related to the Bill and their consequences, if the Bill is enacted in its present form.

CPA raised these issues in 2012, in both petitions filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Bill and in awareness raising material produced in all three languages.

  1. Divineguma Bill- Basic Guide updated January 2013 (E)
  2. Divineguma Bill- Basic Guide updated January 2013 (S)
  3. Divineguma Bill- Basic Guide updated January 2013 (T)