CPA mourns the loss of Mr. Rajavarothiyam Sampanthan

The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) mourns the loss of Rajavarothiyam Sampanthan, MP, one of the most distinguished parliamentarians of our time, who adorned Parliament with his oratorical skills and legislative ability. 

In his time as a Member of Parliament, and especially as the Leader of the Opposition in 2015-19, he dominated the proceedings of Parliament – in the floor of the House, in Committee, and outside. His élan was reminiscent of an earlier era of our legislature. During the devaluation of Parliament in the period of the current presidential constitution, Mr Sampanthan was among a handful of parliamentarians who kept our tradition and idiom of parliamentary traditions and politics alive. His mastery of historical and policy detail; his fluency in all three languages; his knowledge of our parliamentary customs and procedure; his chairing skill over committees; his genial but firm ability to work with both fellow Members as well as parliamentary officials and civil servants, made him an exemplary legislator. 

Mr Sampanthan was an indefatigable defender of the Tamil people as the leader of his party. He began his professional life as a practitioner at the Bar, but due to his obvious talents, he was co-opted into Federal Party politics. Mr Sampanthan was one the most articulate and intelligent defenders of the constitutional claims of the Tamil people in the form of a federal Sri Lanka. With his linguistic and cultural felicity, however, he loved and delighted in the company of all the other communities of Sri Lanka. He was one of the true exemplars of a plural and united Sri Lanka. 

He was a friend of CPA and many members of CPA, actively participating in our activities both in the country and abroad over many years. He was a superb raconteur, sharing (often rather long) stories with knowledge, wit, and wisdom, and with the impeccable timing of the born story-teller. He had a most healthy sense of humour, and he enjoyed being teased (within limits).        

In Mr Sampanthan’s passing, we have lost a politician to whom civic duty was all, and we send our condolences to his family and all of those who, like us, admired and appreciated him.

Download the statement from here

 

18 Years Later

Sri Lanka continues to face significant challenges 15 years since the end of the civil war in the country. Successive governments have struggled to address issues such as memorialization, land conflicts, militarisation, and economic disparity. These and other problems are setbacks for healing and coexistence. Without a real commitment to solving these issues, trust in the government remains low, and reconciliation seems far off.

Download the Document in English

Download the Document in Sinhala

Download the Document in Tamil

Public Opinion on Reconciliation in Sri Lanka, May 2024

This report presents key findings of the survey on reconciliation conducted by Social Indicator (SI), the survey research arm of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA). Given the background, the year 2024 marks the 15th anniversary of the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka, the poll was designed to capture the current public opinion on matters related to themes of democracy and reconciliation in Sri Lanka. The survey findings on economic and educational growth prospects, safety and security, political interactions, as well as views on political and religious leadership are discussed in this brief report. The fieldwork was conducted between 19th February and 13th March 2024, with 1372 sample respondents

The Report in English can be downloaded from here

The Report in Sinhala can be downloaded from here

The Report in Tamil can be downloaded from here

 

Understanding Interconnections between Human Rights and Economic Crimes in Sri Lanka: Exploring Issues and Potential Ways Forward

In Sri Lanka, economic crimes perpetrated by PEPs have received critical attention at present, where there have been discussions on plausible interventions to address the culture of impunity and the human rights implications of economic crimes. This report, written primarily to understand and advocate for key issues concerning addressing economic crimes in Sri Lanka, maps out several interconnections between economic crimes perpetrated by PEPs in Sri Lanka and the human rights implications of such crimes. Since the notion of economic crimes suffers from an inherent conceptual confusion, there are a myriad of policy prescriptions and interventions to address economic crimes. With this understanding, the report examines a selection of issue areas concerning impunity for economic crimes in Sri Lanka in-breadth through empirical research. The report consists of three chapters. In Chapter 1, we outline the point of departure of the study, by laying out the conceptual framework of the research. The second chapter is dedicated to presenting the findings of the study, where the readers are provided an overview of certain challenges encountered in addressing economic crimes. This chapter analyses the empirical data collected in the research, by setting out the cross- cutting structural, legal as well as socio-political issues reinforcing a culture of impunity for economic crimes in the country. In the final chapter, we discuss potential interventions that could be utilized in advocacy efforts and strategies for various stakeholders to amplify the demands on the accountability for economic crimes in Sri Lanka at present. The annexure at the end of the report, provides a snapshot of several case studies on grand corruption in Sri Lanka, which could be considered as some of the emblematic cases of economic crimes in the country.

Click Here to read the Report

 

Shifting Tides – A Trend Analysis of Public Opinion on Reconciliation and Democracy in Sri Lanka

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of evolving public opinion on democracy and reconciliation in Sri Lanka, over the past two decades. Employing a comparative approach, it examines responses to recurring questions posed in a series of surveys conducted by SI-CPA and delves into an exploration of longitudinal trends on the following topics: majority-minority relations, social trust, political safeguards for minorities, trust in democracy and institutions, power sharing, secular constitution, and support for constitutional reforms.

Click Here to Download the Document in English

Click Here to Download the Document in Sinhala

Click Here to Download the Document in Tamil

 

 

 

 

Topline Report: Democracy & Reconciliation in Sri Lanka

This report shares the findings of the latest survey on democracy and reconciliation conducted by Social Indicator, the survey arm of the Centre for Policy Alternatives.

The poll was designed to capture the current public opinion on matters related to themes of democracy and reconciliation in Sri Lanka. This report discusses the public opinion on ethnic relationships, safeguards in the social and political realms that are in place for minority protection, trust and tolerance within ethnic groups, trust in institutions and democracy as well as opinion on constitutional reforms. The fieldwork was conducted between 4th and 22nd of January 2024.

Download the Report in English

Download the Report in Sinhala

Download the Report in Tamil

 

Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) challenges constitutionality of the appointment of Inspector General of the Sri Lanka Police (IGP)

The Executive Director of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA), Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, filed a Petition in the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka challenging the constitutionality of the Presidential appointment of Mr. Deshabandu Thennakoon as Inspector General of the Sri Lanka Police (IGP) on the 26th of February 2024.

Article 41C of the 1978 Constitution of Sri Lanka provides that such an appointment by the President cannot occur without approval from the Constitutional Council of Sri Lanka. According to Article 41E, that approval should have at least 5 votes in favour. The Leader of the Opposition, who is a member of the Council, has alleged that the Council did not approve the appointment of the IGP with the minimum 5 votes.

As such the Petition, argued that the appointment of the IGP was unconstitutional. Furthermore, the Petition also argued that Mr. Thennakoon is manifestly unsuitable for the role of IGP as the Supreme Court, in a fundamental rights case, found him to have engaged in torture (in the Supreme Court decision of SC (FR) 107/2011 Mr. Thennakoon was determined to have infringed Articles 11, 12(1), 13(1) and 13(2) of the Constitution.)

Essentially, his appointment as IGP will infringe Article 12(1) of the Constitution as it is arbitrary, grossly unreasonable and against the public trust.