Centre for Policy Alternatives on 28 September, 2021

Vacancy: Researcher – Research and Advocacy Team

Centre for Policy Alternatives has a vacancy for an experienced individual to work as:

RESEARCHER– RESEARCH & ADVOCACY TEAM

QUALIFICATIONS/EXPERIENCE

  • Political Science, International Relations or Social Sciences Degree or
  • Research experience or relevant professional qualifications

OTHER SKILLS/ATTRIBUTES

  • Strong research and analytical skills 
  • Excellent written and spoken English 
  • Excellent interpersonal skills 
  • Dynamic and able to multi-task in a confidential, challenging environment 
  • Knowledge of Sinhala and/or Tamil would be an advantage.
  • High competency in Microsoft Office
  • Willingness to travel out of station on work 

 

APPLICATIONS: Please forward your application together with a resume with contact details of two non-related referees, within seven days of this advertisement. 

The position applied for should be indicated on the subject line of email.

Centre for Policy Alternatives, 6/5, Layards Road, Colombo 5 OR email to [email protected] 

23rd September 2021

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 15 September, 2021

CPA Statement on allegations against State Minister of Prison Management and Prisoners’ Rehabilitation

15th September 2021, Colombo, Sri Lanka: The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) is deeply disturbed by media reports of two incidents this week where the State Minister of Prison Management and Prisoners’ Rehabilitation Lohan Ratwatte is alleged to have abused his position by entering two prisons inebriated, and attempted to assault remand prisoners. On Sunday 12 September, the State Minister is reported to have entered the Welikada Prison with a group of friends. Subsequently he is reported to have travelled by helicopter to Anuradhapura where he had entered the Anuradhapura Prison and ordered two suspects at gunpoint to kneel down in front of him. Both these incidents reflect the alarming trend of flaunting political office for personal gratification, the callousness and disregard for the rights of prisoners and human dignity, the use of arms to threaten individuals and the contempt for the rule of law in Sri Lanka. In light of the serious nature of these incidents, CPA calls for the immediate resignation of the State Minister, for the authorities to initiate a credible investigation into the incident, and action taken without fear or favour.

CPA also notes that such incidents occur against the background of previous incidents of violence including several prison riots which led to the deaths of inmates with no known domestic process of accountability. This is compounded by past incidents of violence linked to the State Minister including his alleged involvement in the murder of ten Muslim youth in Udathalawinne in 2001 where he and several others were indicted for the murders but subsequently acquitted. In such a context of impunity, there are genuine fears of evidence tampering and witness intimidation that will undermine an independent process meant to investigate and hold perpetrators accountable. These speak to the setbacks with justice in multiple emblematic cases and the urgent need for structural reforms in Sri Lanka.

These two incidents occurred whilst Sri Lanka’s human rights record is being discussed at the ongoing 48th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). In fact, the incidents occurred on the eve of the Government of Sri Lanka’s response to the oral update of the High Commissioner for Human Rights with the Government claiming that they are “committed to achieving tangible progress on the entire range of issues relating to accountability, reconciliation, human rights, peace and sustainable development”. Inability at this critical juncture to take swift and firm action related to these two incidents, among many others, will send a clear message that the Government of Sri Lanka has no genuine intention of following through with its own statements and further reinforce reports by victims and civil society of the repressive climate and impunity in Sri Lanka. This is also days prior to the commencement of the United Nations General Assembly session where President Gotabaya Rajapaksa is tipped to participate, providing an opportunity for Member States of United Nations and the office of the United Nations Secretary General to raise concerns about the deteriorating human rights situation and entrenched impunity in Sri Lanka and the need for Sri Lanka to uphold the values enshrined in the United Nations Charter.

This statement can be read and downloaded in English, Tamil and Sinhala.

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 7 September, 2021

CPA Outreach Unit Publication and Research Study on RTI

The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) Outreach Unit, officially launched the RTI Publication, “The Right to Information and Media Practice” and the Research report on the ‘Responsiveness of Public Authorities to Right to Information Applications submitted via Email’ on the 21st of January, 2021 at the Renuka City Hotel, Colombo. The initiative was conducted in partnership with the Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit (FNF).

The Publication is a collection of news articles and success stories derived through RTI elicited information by prolific journalists and RTI users who have worked closely with CPA. While investigative journalism is one of the key contributions that strengthen democracy and accountability, the publication includes a series of wide-ranging stories proving that RTI is a potent weapon of investigative journalism. The publication aims to empower journalists and the public to utilize RTI legislation to secure documentary proof they need to add credibility to their stories and report in a more balanced and responsible manner. Hence, the launch of this publication will benefit in the long-term towards bolstering investigative journalism while strengthening democracy, fair governance, and accountability and popularize the use of RTI amongst the Sri Lankan media and the civil society.

The above publication ‘The Right to Information and Media Practice’ is available for reading in English, Sinhala, and Tamil.

The research study aims at assessing the responsiveness of public authorities to requests for information made via emails. Emphasizing the importance of the use of electronic media in requesting information in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic situation, a total of 695 requests for information were sent by email in Sinhala and Tamil, to the official email addresses of 695 public authorities. The research recommends the need to replace functioning email addresses of all public authorities in relevant websites, to widen public awareness about the implementation of the right to information using electronic means and for authorities to support and respond to information requests through electronic means as the best alternative to the direct exercise of the right to information amid the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

The research study ‘Responsiveness of Public Authorities to Right to Information Applications submitted via Email’ can be read and downloaded in English, Sinhala, and Tamil

 

 

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 2 September, 2021

Initial comment on the Declaration of a State of Emergency and Regulations for the Maintenance of Essential Supplies and Services

September, 2, 2021, Colombo, Sri Lanka: On the 30th of August 2021, by way of Gazette 2243/1, President Gotabaya Rajapakse issued a proclamation under Section 2 of the Public Security Ordinance (Chapter 40) as amended. In the Proclamation, the President states that ‘I am of the opinion that it is considered expedient to do so in order to ensure the Public Security and well being and maintenance of supplies and services essential to the life of the community in view of the prevailing emergency situation in Sri Lanka in the context of the COVID – 19 pandemic now steadily on the rise throughout Sri Lanka’. It has widely been reported that private banks are unable to finance food imports due to foreign exchange shortages, and as such a food shortage is expected. This is amidst rising food prices both locally and internationally. However, the government claims there are no shortages but only distribution issues with vendors hoarding stocks.

The present comment is prepared by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) to briefly explain the legal basis for the declaration of a state of emergency and specifically Emergency (Provision of Essential Food) Regulation, No. 1 of 2021 published in Gazette 2243/3 dated 30th August 2021.

Section 2 of the Public Security Ordinance (PSO) empowers the President to declare a State of Emergency in two situations; when the President is of the opinion that it is expedient to do so-

1) in the interest of public security and the preservation of public order, or

2) for the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the life of the community.

CPA has previously commented on the constitutional and legal scheme of a State of Emergency and what it entails, in the context of the State of Emergency that was declared by President Maithripala Sirisena in 2018.

Unlike the previous emergencies that were declared following unrest in 2018 and the Easter Sunday Bombings in 2019, the present declaration of emergency appears to be reliant on the second component relevant for the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the life of the community. However, CPA notes that regardless of the reason for the declaration of a State of Emergency, once such a declaration is made it gives the President wide powers with only limited checks and balances. With the declaration of a State of Emergency on 30th August 2021, the President is now able to promulgate Emergency Regulations dealing with any subject at any given time. Considering Sri Lanka’s history with emergency, other security related laws and legacy of repression, this raises serious concerns. The implementation of the present regulation and possible future steps require close attention.

This commentary is available for reading in English and Tamil. A version in Sinhala will follow shortly.

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 25 August, 2021

Mangala Samaraweera: An Appreciation

25th, August, 2021, Mangala Samaraweera was a personal friend and a friend of CPA.  He shared our vision and dream of a Sri Lanka in which all of its peoples would respect each other and strive together for the peace, prosperity and reconciliation, our country desires and deserves.  Like us, he believed in the Rule of Law and the equality before the law for all citizens without fear or favour and like us, he spoke truth to power, standing defiantly against the mudslinging and hysteria of his detractors.

I knew Mangala before he entered politics, in his Art Centre Club days basking in the Bohemian ambience of the place and in the liberalism it nurtured.  I remember conversations with him and Chanaka Amaratunga on the fundamental principles of liberalism and once he became an organizer in Matara, his amusement at his constituents commenting that he was humble enough to wear his father’s trousers and not an example of the recent fashion, an area in which he excelled and revolutionized too. We weren’t always on the same page politically, especially over the violent excesses of the infamous Wayamba provincial election, but we always remained friends.

His political achievements are many.  Every Sri Lankan owes him a debt over the privatization of Sri Lanka Telecom, an enduring legacy of organizational skill and political acumen.  In the field of human rights and reconciliation he was the champion first of the Mothers Front, empathizing and demanding justice for the victims of violence and then the Sudu Nelum Movement, which reached out to the grassroots about the ethnic conflict and the need for meaningful devolution. Likewise in 2015, his authorship of the four mechanisms for transitional justice- the Office for Missing Persons (OMP), the Office of Reparations, the Truth and Justice Commission and the mechanism for accountability.  Only the first two have been set up but Mangala did not lose his searing sense of priority with respect to the other two as well.  He spoke out, freely and candidly about the violations of human rights and democratic freedoms and when he retired from parliamentary politics, he devoted himself to spreading the message of rights and freedom, toleration and diversity to all. Right through to the end of his life, he believed in a Sri Lanka which was a functioning democracy based on the principle of Unity in Diversity.

As the Minister of Posts and Telecommunication, Foreign Affairs and Finance, respectively, he left behind a legacy, which no other politician can claim to have.  As a politician he came to espouse and to defend liberal democracy, in word and deed in a way in which no other politician has.  As a human being he was mischievous, generous and committed in every sense of the phrase to the joi d’vivre of life and living.

As my friend and as the friend of CPA, I am indebted in having known him and will always remember him in the words of Bernard Shaw, saying:

 

You see things and you say “Why?” But I dream things that never were; and I say “Why not?”

 

Dr Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu

Executive Director

 

This statement can be downloaded by clicking here 

 

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 13 August, 2021

Is the Cure Worse than the Disease? Reflections on COVID Governance in Sri Lanka

13th August, 2021 – Is the Cure Worse than the Disease? Reflections on Pandemic Governance in Sri Lanka is the result of an initiative of Social Indicator (SI), the survey research arm of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA). The ‘Socio-Economic Index In the Face of COVID-19’, an island wide opinion poll conducted from February-March 2021 by SI, aimed to capture the experiences and perceptions of Sri Lankans through the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings derived from this survey compelled a more in-depth consideration of many of the themes therein, leading to the idea of a research volume germinating in the minds of the project team.        

Stemming from this context, this volume examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the political, economic, and social life of Sri Lankan society, and its’ transformative effect on the political culture of the country: How have the strategies and policies adopted by the government to fight the pandemic impacted society? More particularly, how have such strategies and policies impacted on delivering governance, health, and education fairly across all communities? Chapters of the volume are a quest for answers to these questions focusing on different sectors of society, their experience of the pandemic, and the implications of such experience on their future trajectory.

Individual chapters and contributions can be downloaded by clicking on the links below.
To download the complete book in English, click here.
To download the complete book in Sinhala, click here.
To download the complete book in Tamil, click here.

Cover Photo by Nazly Ahmed

Contents | පටුන | உள்ளடக்கம்

List of Contributors | දායක වූ ලේඛකයන් | பங்குபற்றாளர்கள்

Foreword | පෙරවදන | அணிந்துரை

by Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu | ආචාර්ය පාක්‍යසෝති සරවනමුත්තු | கலாநிதி பாக்கியசோதி சரவணமுத்து

Preface and Acknowledgements | පූර්විකාව සහ ස්තූතිය | முன்னுரையும் நன்றி நவிலலும்

 

Editor’s Introduction (Chapter 1) | හැඳින්වීම | அத்தியாயம் 1

Introduction Reflections on COVID governance in Sri Lanka by Pradeep Peiris
ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කොවිඩ් ආණ්ඩුකරණය පිළිබඳ ආවර්ජනා ප්‍රදීප් පීරිස්
அறிமுகம்: இலங்கையில் கொவிட் ஆளுகையின் பிரதிபலிப்புகள் பிரதீப் பீரிஸ்

 

Chapter 2 | 2 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 2

Sri Lanka’s accelerated democratic decay amidst a pandemic by Bhavani Fonseka and Kushmila Ranasinghe
වසංගතයක් තුළ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයේ සීඝ්‍ර පරිහානිය භවානි ෆොන්සේකා සහ කුෂ්මිලා රණසිංහ
பெருந்தொற்றுக்கு மத்தியில் இலங்கையில் துரிதமாக்கப்பட்ட சனநாயகச் சிதைவு பவானி பொன்சேகா மற்றும் குஷ்மிலா ரணசிங்க

 

Chapter 3 | 3 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 3

Healing the population by constructing subjects: Pandemic governmentality of Sri Lanka by Pradeep Peiris
යටත්වැසියන් නිර්මාණය කිරීමෙන් ජනගහණය සුව කිරීම: ලංකාවේ වසංගත ආණ්ඩුකරණ මාදිලිය ප්‍රදීප් පීරිස්
கீழ்ப்படிவுள்ள பிரசைகளைக் கட்டியெழுப்புவதனூடாக மக்களை மாற்றுதல்: இலங்கையில் பெருந்தொற்று ஆளுகை பிரதீப் பீரிஸ்

 

Chapter  4 | 4 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 4

Lives or livelihoods?The erosion of welfare in Sri Lanka’s COVID-19 response by
Nipunika O. Lecamwasam
ජීවිතද ජීවනෝපායන්ද? ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කොවිඩ්-19 ප්‍රතිචාරය තුළ සුබසාධනයේ පරිහානිය නිපුනිකා ඕ. ලේකම්වසම්
வாழ்வா அல்லது வாழ்வாதாரமா? இலங்கையின் கொவிட்-19 பதில் நடவடிக்கையில் தேய்ந்து போகும் சேமநலன் நிபுணிகா ஓ. லேக்கம்வசம்

 

Chapter 5 | 5 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 5

Ethno-centric pandemic governance: The Muslim community in Sri Lanka’s COVID response by
Sakina Moinudeen
වර්ගවාදී වසංගත ආණ්ඩුකරණය: ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කොවිඩ් ප්‍රතිචාරය තුළ මුස්ලිම් ප්‍රජාව සකිනා මොයිනුඩීන්
இனத்துவ-மையவாத பெருந்தொற்று ஆளுகை: இலங்கையின் கொவிட் பதில் நடவடிக்கைகளில் முஸ்லிம் சமூகம் சகினா மொய்னுதீன்

 

Chapter 6 | 6 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 6

Not-so-free education: State-citizen relations in Sri Lanka’s educational policy response to the pandemic by Hasini Lecamwasam
නිදහස්-නොවන-අධ්‍යාපනය: වසංගත සන්දර්භයෙහි ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ අධ්‍යාපන ප්‍රතිපත්තිය තුළ රාජ්‍ය-පුරවැසි සම්බන්ධතා හසිනි ලේකම්වසම්
இலவசமில்லாத கல்வி: பெருந்தொற்றுக் காலத்தில் இலங்கையின் கல்விசார் கொள்கைப் பதில் நடவடிக்கையில் அரசு-பிரசை உறவுகள் ஹசினி லேக்கம்வசம்

 

Chapter 7 | 7 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 7 

Out of the frying pan into the fire: Life of migrant garment workers in the COVID-19 response by
Kaushini Dammalage
කබලෙන් ලිපට වැටීම: කොවිඩ්-19 ප්‍රතිචාරය තුළ සංක්‍රමණික ඇඟළුම් කම්හල් සේවකයින්ගේ ජීවිතය කෞෂිණී දම්මලගේ
எண்ணெய்ச் சட்டியிலிருந்து நெருப்புக்குள்: கொவிட் பதில் நடவடிக்கைகளும் உள்நாட்டுக்குள் குடிபெயர்ந்த ஆடைத் தொழிற்சாலைத் தொழிலாளர்களும் கௌஷினி தம்மாலகே

 

Chapter 8  | 8 වන පරිච්ඡේදය | அத்தியாயம் 8

Contacts during difficult times: A study on the function of social networks in accessing state services during the COVID-19 pandemic by Shashik Silva
දුෂ්කර සමයක සමාජ සම්බන්ධතා: කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගත තත්වය තුළ රාජ්‍ය සේවා ලබාගැනීමේදී සමාජ සම්බන්ධතා ජාල වල භූමිකාව පිළිබඳ අධ්‍යයනයක් ශෂික් සිල්වා
கடினமான காலங்களில் தொடர்புகள்: கொவிட்-19 பெருந்தொற்றுக் காலத்தில் அரசசேவைகளைப் பெற்றுக்கொள்வதில் சமூக வலையமைப்புகளின் செயற்பாடு பற்றிய ஒரு ஆய்வு ஷஷிக் சில்வா

 

 

Annexure 1 | ඇමුණුම 1 | பின்னிணைப்பு 1

THE ‘SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDEX IN THE FACE OF COVID-19’ SURVEY: AN OVERVIEW‘
කොවිඩ්-19 හමුවේ සමාජ-ආර්ථික දර්ශකය’ පිළිබඳ සමීක්ෂණය: දළ විශ්ලේෂණ
கொவிட்-19 காலத்தில் சமூக-பொருளாதாரக் குறிகாட்டி பற்றிய கணிப்பீடு: ஒரு கண்ணோட்டம்

 

Annexure 2 | ඇමුණුම 2 | பின்னிணைப்பு 2

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDEX IN THE FACE OF COVID-19
පර්යේෂණ මෙවලම කොවිඩ් 19 හමුවේ සමාජ – ආර්ථීක දර්ශකය
வினாக்கொத்து – கொவிட்-19 காலத்தில் சமூக-பொருளாதாரக் குறிகாட்டி

 

Annexure 3 | ඇමුණුම 3 | பின்னிணைப்பு 3

RESULTS
ප්‍රතිඵල
முடிவுகள்

Centre for Policy Alternatives on 26 July, 2021

Centre for Policy Alternatives Files Petition in the Supreme Court (SC SD 28/2021) against proposed Finance Bill

On the 26th July 2021, The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and its Executive Director, Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu filed a Petition in the Supreme Court (SC SD 28/2021) challenging the proposed Finance Bill, which was placed on the order paper of Parliament on the 20th of July 2021. The Bill seeks to provide an amnesty from tax, penalty or interest, or from any investigation or prosecution, to anyone who has not disclosed any taxable supply, income or asset which was required to be disclosed by law, provided that they invest an equivalent amount in the manner specified in the Bill.

CPA’s position is that several clauses in the Bill are inconsistent with the Constitution, including several entrench provisions, and thus cannot be passed into law except if approved by the people at a referendum in addition to a two-thirds vote of the whole number of the Members of Parliament in favour as required by Article 83(a) of the Constitution. 

CPA challenged clauses 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Bill on the basis that they are inconsistent with Articles 12(1), 4(d), 14(1)(g) read with Article 3 of the Constitution, as inter alia they legitimize fraud and are discriminatory towards those who have already disclosed and paid their taxes in accordance with the law. CPA also challenged clauses 10, 11 and 17 on similar grounds. CPA further challenged clause 7 of the Bill, which guarantees secrecy regarding the identity of such declarants, which is in violation of Articles 12(1), 14A, 4(d) read with Article 3 of the Constitution. 

CPA notes with concern that if passed, the Bill will result in impunity to those involved in corruption and fraud on the State and the populace as a whole. Further, the lack of transparency is inconsistent with the principles of good governance, especially in an era where the Right to Information has been expressly recognized by the Constitution and guaranteed to the people.