Letter to the Minister of Justice and National Integration on Critical Law and Policy Reforms

Over the decades, CPA has highlighted the critical need for reforms addressing truth and justice in Sri Lanka, which require renewed attention against the backdrop of the ongoing work around mass graves and other developments linked to Sri Lanka’s past cycles of violence. Whilst CPA acknowledges the work done by state officials pertaining to forensics and other work, the complexities of ascertaining truth and pursuing justice require expertise and resources that are urgently needed. In this regard, CPA reiterates the need for capacity building and legal and structural reforms that can facilitate processes that are independent, impartial, and victim-centred. Based on interviews with a range of stakeholders, including those based in the North and East, CPA highlights the following:

  • Strengthen Forensic Expertise: There is a need to strengthen the overall forensic investigation capacity and expertise of the state, including the Judicial Medical Officer (JMO) and others.
  • Provide Resources and Initiate Reforms towards the Establishment of an Independent DNA Facility: The work in the past with the Chemmani Mass Grave and other sites, and ongoing work with multiple sites, highlights the need for an independent facility that is able to store and process DNA samples.
  • The Need for Independent Investigations and Prosecutions: Recent events demonstrate the urgent need for the establishment of an office to independently investigate and prosecute serious human rights and economic crimes. The work around mass graves and Sri Lanka’s case load of enforced disappearances reinforce the need for such an entity.
  • Ensuring Procedure in Excavation: Standard operating procedure should be introduced in the excavation of mass graves to cover excavations, exhumations and investigations.
  • Obtaining International Assistance: The complex nature of excavations and investigations highlights the need for international observers and assistance that can support and strengthen the work.
  • Psychosocial Support for Victims: The discovery and exhumation of mass graves have deep psychological effects on victims and affected communities. The State must enhance local capacity to provide psychosocial support and related issues.
  • Victim-Centred Approach: The Government must ensure all processes and reforms are victim-centred, including the need for transparency and regular information sharing to address the trust deficit towards domestic initiatives.
  • Resource Allocation for Investigations, Prosecutions and Related Matters: The Government must take all steps to provide resources for ongoing excavations, forensic and other related work and investigations and ensure the required allocations are made with the forthcoming appropriations bill.

There is a considerable body of work done by the Office on Missing Persons (OMP) and Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL), amongst others, on issues around enforced disappearances, the excavation of mass graves, and related issues. All efforts must be made to ensure there is no political interference with such entities and that they are provided the required resources to function independently.

We welcome an opportunity to meet and discuss these critical matters further and offer our continued support in implementing the necessary reforms to build a system of justice that reflects the aspirations of all citizens.

Click Here to Download the Document

Urgent Reform: Establishing an Independent Public Prosecutor’s Office

I write on behalf of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) in response to news reports that Your Ministry has appointed an expert committee as an initial step towards establishing an independent prosecutor’s office. The CPA has consistently advocated for creation of an independent prosecutors office as a means to ensure greater accountability and confidence in Sri Lanka’s justice system. The multiple and often conflicting roles of the Attorney-General’s Office have been addressed previously by CPA in ‘Rethinking the Attorney General’s Department in Sri Lanka: Ideas for Reform’ and, more recently, in ‘Calls for a Public Prosecutor’s Office – The Urgent Need for Reforms’. Thus, an Independent Public Prosecutor’s Office is crucial for ensuring fair, effective, and impartial prosecution of cases, especially high-profile and cases which relate to politically exposed persons. As part of the broader reform in Sri Lanka advocated for by CPA, we kindly urge you to consider the following issues and principles in establishing an independent public prosecutor’s office:

1. Impartiality and Insulation from Influence: The office must be non-partisan and thoroughly insulated from political bias, ensuring the law is applied equally to all. This requires robust recruitment practices and legislated tenure to protect against external influences and non-interference by the political actors regarding decisions of appointments and promotions within the office.

2. Independence in Structure and Function: The prosecution department should stand structurally independent from other branches of government to reaffirm the separation of powers. This promotes accountability, checks and balances, and transparency within the justice system, insulating prosecutorial decisions from political pressure or fear of retribution. Persons working for the office should not have any interface with the executive and political actors in the discharge of their functions. It is important not only to create an institution which is actually independent, but it has to also be seen as being independent in order to inspire public confidence.

3. Trust Building with the Public: As the primary means of pursuing punishment for criminal behaviour, the office must instill public trust in the justice system. It must primarily serve public interests and proactively increase the accessibility and transparency of the justice system, including by developing a prosecutorial policy that is accessible to the public.

4. Sufficient Resourcing and Training: As addressed by previous CPA reports, the office requires independent financial resources, comprehensive recruitment processes, and the logistical capacity to provide investigation services, alongside legal and administrative capabilities.

5. Accountability: The office must be accountable to Parliament, particularly concerning resource utilisation. Financial oversight should be carried out by a body (of Parliament) that include a variety of political actors representing different political parties (split equally between government and opposition). Such oversight should be without any derogation of the right and ability to independent exercise of prosecutorial discretion. The office should be subject to judicial review.

CPA emphasises that the Ministry’s recent initiative to appoint an expert committee towards establishing an independent prosecutor’s office is only the first step in a process that needs to be transparent and inclusive, involving a process of obtaining representations from victims, lawyers, academics, civil society, and other relevant stakeholders. Such an inclusive process will foster broader discussion, engage all parties, and build public trust, demonstrating a genuine commitment to transparent and accountable reforms that strengthen the rule of law and democracy in Sri Lanka. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. We believe that these reforms are fundamental to upholding justice and restoring public confidence in Sri Lanka’s legal system.

Sincerely,

Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
Executive Director

 

Click Here to Download the Document

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights visit to Sri Lanka: Recommendations and Key Issues for Consideration

June 2025

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights H.E. Volker Turk is scheduled to visit Sri Lanka this month—the first visit by a High Commissioner since the 2024 election of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the National People’s Power (NPP) government. The visit takes place at a key moment in Sri Lanka with the country grappling with the effects of its ongoing governance and economic crises, cycles of past violence, and the lasting effects of a nearly three-decade conflict. The 2024 change of government promised reform and reignited hope that a new political culture would emerge.

Yet, seven months later, the implementation of confidence-building measures and key governance and legal reforms have been delayed. A significant section of society also faces severe socio-economic challenges. Amidst such a context, human rights abuses persist. The recent use of the Prevention of Terror Act (PTA) has violated the due process of suspects. Long-standing issues, such as land appropriation, continue to deny communities of their right to access, own and use their lands, freedom of movement, and means of survival. Reports of torture and custodial death have also occurred under the Dissanayake government. These and other issues expose the prevalence of human rights violations that threaten to reinforce historical patterns of violence and trigger future conflict. They are also critical indicators of the need for a prevention agenda and engagement in promoting human rights and strengthening the rule of law in Sri Lanka.

The visit takes place at this critical juncture when the government can be supported in their plans of implementing its own promises. In light of the impending visit, the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) urges the High Commissioner and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to inform their meetings and messages to the government, state entities, and others with the following recommendations:

  1. Have a genuine and open dialogue with victims, survivors, and civil society in Sri Lanka, including visiting the war-affected areas in the North and East.
  2. Highlight the need for concrete steps to address accountability in Sri Lanka. This includes the need for tangible and time-bound progress on emblematic cases, legal and structural reforms, including the establishment of the promised Public Prosecutor’s Office, and other necessary reforms to ensure an independent and credible judicial process in Sri Lanka.
  3. Emphasize the need for an immediate moratorium on the use of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and its immediate repeal. Any future attempts at law reforms must adhere to international standards and be drafted after wide consultations.
  4. Highlight the need for other urgent legal reforms, including the repeal of the Online Safety Act (OSA), reform to the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA), the Vagrancy Ordinance, provisions of the Penal Code, and other measures to ensure equality, non-discrimination, and the dignity of all citizens.
  5. Raise concerns about ongoing efforts at land appropriation and occupation that have dispossessed many individuals and communities. Particular attention must be paid to acquisitions in the North and East, a call for transparent land appropriation reforms that contain due process safeguards and address the grievances of affected communities.
  6. Visit sites of mass graves and raise the need for adherence to international standards of exhumation, recording, reporting, and identification.
  7. Reaffirm the right to religious worship and religious freedom.
  8. Raise the need for independent investigations into custodial torture and encounter killings, accountability for such violations, and urgent reforms in this regard.
  9. Highlight the continued challenges faced in civic spaces, including administrative and security issues that impede the work of human rights defenders, civil society, community groups, media, and others.
  10. Urge the Government of Sri Lanka to address persistent socio-economic challenges, including through the introduction of governance reforms that are just, fair, and equitable.
  11. Emphasize the importance of undertaking constitutional reforms in a transparent and timely manner that facilitate the abolition of the executive presidency, address a political solution, and bring required checks and balances, among other key reforms. These reforms should include a full implementation of Sri Lanka’s existing constitution, especially concerning the limited devolution of power granted by the 13th amendment, pending constitutional reform.
  12. Raise the need for a new Resolution on Sri Lanka with a two-year reporting period, that provides for continued monitoring and support for human rights, accountability, and reconciliation. CPA also recommends the renewal of the OHCHR Sri Lanka Accountability Project (OSLAP) and its ability to visit Sri Lanka.

The human rights, accountability, and reconciliation issues underscored in these recommendations require urgent attention. CPA calls upon the High Commissioner and the OHCHR to use this visit to highlight these concerns and emphasize the need for immediate action, including a time-bound roadmap for implementation of reforms.

 

Centre for Policy Alternatives

 

Click Here to Download the Document

Land Appropriation Continues to Threaten Northern and Eastern Communities

The appropriation of land under the guise of security, development and other reasons, in the Northern and Eastern provinces, highlights the complexities of Sri Lanka’s land related conflicts. Over the decades, several initiatives have been taken to dispossess people of their lands such as the creation of high security zones and special economic zones to more recently the use of “national heritage”. In several instances, laws and policies have been used in the attempts of appropriating lands, oftentimes done with scant regard for transparency, due process and the rights of citizens. This is in a context where the legal framework governing land in Sri Lanka is complex, with many unaware of legal and procedural tools that can be used to appropriate their lands thereby paving the way for dispossession and displacement.

For instance, the Land Acquisition Act, No. 09 of 1950 is one such tool that has been repeatedly employed by successive governments to dispossess people of their lands. It allows the state to acquire private land for ‘public purpose’. The overwhelming practice in the  Northern and Eastern provinces shows that this law has been used in an arbitrary manner and without affording citizens even the very limited protection the law offers. As per Section 2 of the Act, the Minister has the discretion to declare lands to be acquired and notice of land acquisition is to be made publicly available (displayed in conspicuous places) and to be displayed in all three official languages. In response to a Section 2 notice in 2013 affecting large tracts of land in the Valikamam North in the Jaffna Peninsula, writ applications were filed by 2,176 individuals from Jaffna. CA Writ 125/2013 (Arunasalam Kunabalasingham and 1473 others Vs. A. Sivaswamy and 2 others) and CA Writ 135/2013 were by petitioners who set out to bring to attention the forcible acquisition of an area of the Jaffna Peninsula equivalent to two-third of the entire city of Colombo. Several such attempts at acquisitions have been challenged in court with many mobilising over the years to prevent ad hoc and unjust attempts at land appropriation.

Another state initiative that attempted to appropriate land was via Land Circular No.2011/04 that required all landowners of the North and East, including private landowners to furnish details to the relevant Divisional Secretary or Assistant Government Agent, through the Grama Niladhari, within two months. Such a step meant that many private landowners of the North and East stood to lose title to their lands if they failed to furnish details within two months. In this instance, CPA and several others raised concerns with the broad powers provided under the Land Circular to dispossess individuals from their lands. Subsequently it was challenged in court (M.A Sumanthiran Vs. R.P.R Rajapaksha and others) in CA Writ Application 620/2011 and a Fundamental Rights Petition in the Supreme Court SC FR 494/2011 with the government withdrawing the said Circular.

Post war years have continued to see other attempts at land appropriation via the use of laws and policies and with the involvement of state and non-state actors including development and religious actors. CPA’s recent report (The Intersectional Trends of Land Conflicts in Sri Lanka) provides an overview of the range of actors, laws and policies that are at play and the consequences of such actions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Area Considered Under Land Settlement Ordinace Amount of Land Considered
Mullaitivu (Settlement Notice Nos. 5620, 5621, 5622) 1702 Acres
Jaffna (Settlement Notice Nos. 5617, 5618) 3669 Acres
Kilinochchi (Settlement Notice No. 5619) 515 Acres
Mannar (Settlement Notice No 5623) 54 Acres

 

In the most recent attempt, the government issued Gazette No. 2430 on 28th of March 2025 that stated that lands in the districts of Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Mannar, and Mullaitivu will be claimed as State land if the owners of such lands do not claim them before the 28th of June 2025.

CPA and local politicians have raised this issue which resulted in the government promising to revoke the Gazette but at the time of writing no such revocation has taken place in terms of the law. On 12 June 2025, M. A. Sumanthiran filed a fundamental rights application SC FR 112/2025 in the Supreme Court challenging the Gazette.

This Gazette is the most recent attempt by the state to dispossess people via the use of legal and policy initiatives, further exacerbating fears and apprehensions among people of their ability to fully enjoy and use their lands. The numerous initiatives over the years also demonstrates the continued use of the law and administrative processes to appropriate lands, against the background of successive governments failing to fully implement the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution that provides for the limited devolution of land powers to the provinces and the establishment of the National Land Commission. These and other land issues are indicative that the root causes of the conflict continue to be sustained in Sri Lanka.

 

Centre for Policy Alternatives
13.06.2025 

Concerns over the continued use of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA)

3 April 2025
The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) is deeply concerned with the continued use of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) by the Sri Lankan state. According to media reports, a youth was recently arrested under the PTA for allegedly pasting stickers that criticised the actions of Israel in Gaza. It is also concerning that the Government has over the past five months utilised the PTA on several occasions including for alleged conduct that has seemingly no known link to terrorism. Furthermore, the arrest of an individual on the basis of voicing an opinion is alarming with wide implications on the right to free speech and dissent. 

This is against the backdrop of President Dissanayake and the Government promising in their campaign manifesto to abolish ‘all oppressive acts including the PTA and ensuring civil rights of people in all parts of the country’. CPA also notes that the President and others in the Government have in the past demanded for the repeal of the PTA, acknowledging then of the abuse caused by the PTA. Despite repeated promises to repeal the PTA, it is regrettable that the Government has backtracked on their own statements, and continues to use the PTA.

CPA and several others have, over the decades, continuously called for the repeal of the PTA. This law, initially introduced as a temporary provision, and later extended as a permanent law, has been used to terrorise generations of Sri Lankans, largely targeting those from ethnic and religious minorities, activists, dissidents, and journalists and normalised torture, with it entrenching a culture of impunity. Such practices should remain in Sri Lankas past, with the Government needing to make a clear break that sees an immediate moratorium of the PTA and its repeal. 

Download the Statement in English

Download the Statement in Sinhala

Download the Statement in Tamil

Letter to the Minister of Women and Child Affairs

On the occasion of International Women’s Day, I write on behalf of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) to urge immediate attention to urgent law and policy reforms towards women empowerment and gender equality. We recognise your efforts, particularly during the CEDAW intervention in February this year, towards upholding and advancing the rights of women in Sri Lanka. However, considering the ground realities we have seen in our years working with communities across the island, there is much work to be done in this regard.

We believe that your leadership is critical at this moment to drive interventions that address multi- dimensional vulnerabilities faced by women and gender minorities in Sri Lanka. Between November 2024 and February 2025, CPA also wrote to his excellency President Dissanayake and Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Minister of Justice and National Integration, to raise issues regarding key interventions that are required in the upcoming months to uphold the rights of the Sri Lankan citizenry, including these vulnerable groups.

CPA’s ongoing work with women and other marginalised and vulnerable groups emphasises the importance of engaging diverse stakeholders transparently in shaping the reform process. Collaborative approaches that take into account diverse perspectives can significantly enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of reform initiatives.

In this regard, annexed to this letter are several areas with relevance to gender and sexual rights where CPA believes intervention is required. These areas have been categorised under the following three-fold framework: (1) Law Reforms and Policy Interventions, (2) Socio-economic rights, includingAccess to Land, Livelihoods and Natural Resources and (3) Representation, Reconciliation and Identity. CPA urges your ministry to prioritise these areas for intervention in the upcoming legislative and policy agenda and hopes that immediate steps will be taken to build a system of justice that reflects the aspirations of all Sri Lankans. CPA also welcomes an opportunity to discuss these matters with you further and offers our continued support in implementing reforms aimed at empowering women and advancing gender equality to transform Sri Lanka. We look forward to your response and to seeing positive steps in this regard.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu

Executive Director

 

Click here to Download the Letter in English

Click here to Download the Letter in Sinhala

Click here to Download the Letter in Tamil