![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
By the end of the third week of the campaign period of the 2001 Parliamentary General Election 1208 incidents of election related violence have been reported to the Centre for Monitoring Election Violence (CMEV) as of November 21,2001. Of these, 654 (54.1%) have been classified as Major incidents which include Murder (18), Attempted Murder (28), Hurt (148), Grievous Hurt (24), Assault (223), Threat and Intimidation (137), Robbery (22), Arson (44), and 08 incidents involving the Misuse of State Resources. These statistics reflect a qualitative and quantitative increase in the incidence of violence over the General Election held in October 2000. During that election campaign period of 39 days a cumulative total of 2044 incidents was reported, with the number of incidents almost doubling between the third and fourth weeks and then again between the fourth and fifth weeks. At the end of three weeks, last year's campaign had recorded only 540 incidents which is less than 45% of those recorded thus far this year. In addition, whereas this year has seen the alleged use of firearms in 235 cases (or 19.5%), in 2000 this figure stood at 113 (20.9%). The number of Murders recorded so far has been 18, as opposed to 12 in the analogous period during the last election. The comparison between these two elections is detailed in Figures 1 - 13 which well demonstrates the fact that the 2001 General Election shows ominous signs of being irrevocably flawed. CMEV forewarns of this likelihood since the 2000 General Election was itself among the most violent elections in Sri Lanka's recent history, and clearly more so than the 1999 Presidential Election and the 1994 General Election. Therefore, if the 2001 General Election already demonstrates a greater level and intensity of violence than the 2000 General Election, this is a tragic state of affairs indeed. The People's Alliance are the alleged perpetrators in 543 (45%) incidents [See Tables 1 - 4]. 301 (55.4%) of the complaints against the PA allege Major Offences and 242 (44.6%) fall under the Minor Offences classification. The UNP is allegedly responsible for 367 (30.4%) incidents of violence of which 191 (52%) fall into the category of Major Offences. 33 (2.7%) complaints relating to incidents of violence have been made against the SLMC of which 18 (54.6%) are in relation to major offences. The JVP, TULF, EPDP and PLOT are each allegedly responsible for 5 incidents of violence whilst 235 (19.4%) complaints have been made against persons of unknown political affiliation. Thus, if we consider only the offences in which the alleged perpetrators have been identified, the PA and UNP taken together account for 93.5% of all campaign-related violations, reinforcing CMEV's repeated claim that these two main contenders are almost exclusively responsible for the unacceptable levels of violence at this and other national elections. The contention these two parties are culpable not merely for the quantitative increase in violence but also for its qualitative heightening is established by the fact that taken together they account for 93.3% of all incidents involving the use of firearms in which the alleged perpetrators' party affiliation has been identified. The UNP is responsible for 632 (52.3%) of the complaints reported, of which 475 or 75.2% have been made against supporters of the PA and 15 against fellow party members. 374 (31%) complaints have been made by the PA, of which 08 are intra party complaints and 286 (76.5%) are against UNP supporters. The JVP has made 77 (06.4%) complaints, mainly against the UNP (57.1%). Persons of unknown party affiliation have been accused in 235 incidents, and persons of undeclared party affiliation have made 53 (04.4%) complaints, which is almost identical to the percentage of such complaints during the 2000 general election. The use of firearms have been reported in 235 (19.5%) incidents, with the PA named as the alleged perpetrator in 107 (45.5%) incidents and persons of unidentified political affiliation in 71 (30.2%).The UNP has been identified as the alleged perpetrator in 46 (19.6%) incidents involving the use of firearms. The highest number of incidents 233 has been reported from the Western Province, which constitutes 19.3% of the total number reported to CMEV. Next in degree of violence is the North Western Province recording 221 (18.3%) incidents. The Uva Province is the only one recording under 50 incidents, and at 47 reports is less than half its nearest rival, Sabaragamuwa Province (103). At the district level, Puttalam and Anuradhapura are clearly the most quantitatively violent, reporting 134 incidents each, while Gampaha (118) is second only to Puttalam in terms of the seriousness of the major incidents alleged within its borders. In Puttalam both the UNP and PA are allegedly responsible for a similar share of the current intolerable violence. In general, this election campaign has marked a clear increase in the UNP's alleged perpetration of violence, vis-à-vis the 2000 General Election. However, strong disparities still exist, notably in Anuradhapura where the PA is allegedly responsible for three times the number of incidents the UNP is. In addition, in Ratnapura, Kegalle, Digamadulla and Gampaha the PA has three-times, two-and-a-half-times, two-and-a-half-times and one-and-a-half-times the allegations leveled at the UNP. In Galle and Hambantota the PA has been accused in five-times more cases than the UNP, but the overall number of incidents is significantly less. On the other hand, in Kalutara, the UNP is allegedly responsible for two-and-half times the number of incidents that the PA is.
A common
theme in all discussions was the heightened interest in the elections
and the expectation that it would result in a larger voter turn out than
in the October 2000 General Elections. Another observation made to the
CMEV delegation was that despite the conflict in the North East, in Jaffna,
the number of incidents of election related violence were insignificant
in comparison to the rest of the country. Misuse of state resources by the EPDP during the campaign was an allegation made by the vast majority of candidates from other political parties and members of the public that CMEV representatives spoke to. Allegations frequently made in this respect were that the EPDP campaign was effectively financed by funds of the Government of Sri Lanka and that RRAN, the Relief and Rehabilitation Authority was issuing cheques post dated to after the election, providing development workers with bicycles as well as the promise of bicycles in return for ballot stuffing on behalf of the EPDP, financial and other material inducements to work for the EPDP and the provision of financial assistance to community organizations without observing the established administrative procedures and regulations of the Government of Sri Lanka . None of the party representatives who made these allegations provided CMEV with material evidence to substantiate the charges. In responding to this allegation, EPDP candidate Matanarasa showed CMEV a cheque dated after the close of nominations and made out to a temple rehabilitation committee of which he was the president and an aide and relative of his, the secretary. Mr. Matanarasa insisted that this had no bearing on his electioneering in Kayts. In discussions with the GA and the Assistant Election Commissioner, CMEV raised a number of concerns which it had, based on its experience of monitoring previous elections in the peninsula and on issues raised in discussions with candidates and members of the public. These related to voter registration, the location of " clusters" of polling stations, the availability of transport, particular concerns regarding the conduct of the election in the Kayts Polling Division and the island of Delft and to allegations regarding the misuse of state resources and property during the election campaign. CMEV was informed by the GA that there was a serious shortage of vehicles for election day - out of an estimated requirement of 160 buses only 85 were currently available- and that priority would be accorded for the transport of election staff. CMEV was also told that political parties had requested that Assistant Returning Officers be sent from outside the peninsula for the conduct of the elections. The GA assured CMEV that voters would be informed in advance of the location of the "clusters" of polling stations. CMEV reiterates the concerns regarding the elections in the Jaffna Peninsula that it expressed during the October 2000 General Elections. It notes that with respect to the arrangements for the conduct of the polls, the situation is largely unchanged and that in respect of the presence of armed cadre resulted in heightened public concern. CMEV calls on the Election Commissioner to ensure that the facilities necessary for the conduct of the election in the North East are not merely provided on paper to satisfy the legal requirement of islandwide General Elections, but provided in fact to the fullest extent possible to ensure that the people there can exercise their right of the franchise without hindrance. This is especially important in the current context and in the light of the interest in participating in the 2001General Elections expressed to the CMEV delegation during its visit to Jaffna and Kayts.
CMEV has recorded 08 and 05 serious complaints respectively against former MPs Mr DM Dassanayake (PA) and Mr Palitha Ranga Bandara (UNP). Chilaw Police Superintendent Mr Willie Abeynayake told CMEV that both these individuals had been released on bail, but OIC, Anamaduwa, Mr R M K B Ratnayake denied the validity of this statement, asserting that since he had taken over the Anamaduwa Police Station on October 28, 2001, no complaints had been received against Mr Dasssanayake, and one complaint against Mr Ranga Bandara. This contradiction marks some of the serious issues confronting the rule of law in the area, which is exacerbated by the manifest partisanship of the Anamaduwa Police in favour of the People's Alliance and Mr Dassanayake. From the point of view of the ordinary residents of the area, a pervading sense of fear and foreboding prevails in Anamaduwa, with hardly anyone stepping out of his/her home after dark, while automatic weapon-toting goons drive around the deserted streets. No one was willing even to discuss the election or the present reign of terror with CMEV monitors for fear of repercussions under cover of darkness. Both the PA and UNP appear to be competing with each other, through provocation and counter-provocation, to escalate the level of violence, and it is patently clear that under the present circumstances the polling on December 5, 2001 will be a sham and a travesty of democracy.
It appears that the Kegalle Police too has instituted an "independent" inquiry into the incident, and OIC Mr M A D Woodward told CMEV that the incident was an altercation between two groups and was not necessarily related to the election campaign. The inquiring officer, Inspector Guneratne, could not be contacted for comment. Mawanella Police OIC, Mr Kapila Seneviratne, informed CMEV that Mr Bandaratilleke had been assaulted on leaving the polling centre and that he should not have done so in the first place, but was unable to explain how leaving the postal voting centre would legitimise the attack. He assured CMEV of his impartiality, and appeared to be unhappy that the Kegalle Police was also investigating the incident. The ASP Kegalle, who refused to divulge his name to CMEV, said that the Kegalle Police Division had appointed an officer to investigate the matter as there had been an allegation against the Mawanella Police. No details were provided about this allegation, and in the light of the Kegalle OIC's comments cited above, CMEV is concerned about the Kegalle Police Division's ability to be independent and impartial. Western
Province When the case was called on November 15, Mr Ranatunga was further remanded until November 20th, and on this date he was released on personal surety and Rs 15,000/- bail. The family of the dead man alleges that the police has acted in a partisan manner in order to protect Mr Ranatunga, and there appear to be some serious irregularities in the handling of this case. CMEV was
formed in 1997 by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA), the Free Media
Movement (FMM) and the Coalition Against Political Violence as an independent
and non- partisan organization to monitor the incidence of election-related
violence.
|
||||||||||||||||||||