| PRESS RELEASE
STATEMENT ON THE CONTINUING VIOLATION
OF THE CONSTITUTION
The
Centre for Policy Alternatives expresses its serious concern
at the
continuing violation of the provisions of the 17th Amendment
to the Constitution. The process commenced soon after the enactment
of the amendment with President Kumaratunga’s refusal to
act on the recommendation of the Council with respect to the appointment
of the Elections Commission. It continued when a new Constitutional
Council was not constituted once the term of the first Council
came to an end in early 2005. The failure to appoint a new Council,
in turn, prevented the appointment of persons to the various Commissions
recognized by the constitution. The crisis with respect to the
Supremacy of the Constitution and the Rule of Law reached new heights
with the shock resignation of two judges of the three member Judicial
Services Commission, citing reasons of conscience for their action.
Almost two months have passed since the election of President
Mahinda Rajapakse. The new President, like his predecessor, has
taken no steps to ensure that these important institutions are
activated, thereby raising serious concerns as to his commitment
to Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law.
The
17 Amendment to the Constitution was passed by Parliament in
considerable
haste in September 2001, mainly at the initiative
of the People’s Alliance and the JVP. The Centre for Policy
Alternatives had some reservations both with respect to the process
of adoption and the substance of the Amendment, but supported the
rationale of the Amendment, which was the depoliticisation of key
public institutions with a view to promoting good governance. The
Amendment is today part of Sri Lanka’s constitution, the
Supreme Law of the land.
The Centre for Policy Alternatives believes that the Prime Minister,
the Speaker and Leader of the Opposition have also demonstrated
a shocking disregard for the Rule of Law by not doing more to prevent
the supreme law from being violated in this manner. They also have
an obligation to keep the public informed as to the reasons for
the non-constitution of the Constitutional Council. Media reports
indicate that there is now a controversy with respect to which
political parties qualify to participate in nomination of a member
to the Council in terms of Article 41 A (1) f. The Speaker must
make a decision on this issue without further delay.
CPA notes with concern the statement issued by the Secretary, Judicial
Services Commission, in which inappropriate references were made
about Justice Shirani Bandaranayake’s background as an academic.
It is now accepted internationally that a Supreme Court or Constitutional
Court should ideally be composed of persons from different backgrounds,
including the judiciary itself, the Bar, both official and unofficial,
and academia, as such diversity enriches the court. The stature
of and respect with which the South African Constitutional Court
is viewed, both in the country and outside, is due to the diverse
backgrounds of the persons on the Court.
The Centre for Policy Alternatives calls upon the President, the
Prime Minister, Speaker and the Leader of the Opposition to fulfil
their constitutional obligations and ensure that the Constitutional
Council is constituted immediately. It also calls upon the President
and the Cabinet of Ministers to desist from making any appointments
or transfers of public servants or police officers in violation
of the provisions of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution. The
intentional violation and subversion of the Constitution must stop.
 |
|
Dr.
Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
Executive Director
17th February 2006
|
|