| PRESS RELEASE
CPA CONDEMNS KILLING OF LAKSHMAN KADIRGAMAR
AND CALLS FOR A PRINCIPLED PEACE PROCESS
The
brutal and cowardly assassination of Sri Lanka’s Foreign
Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar is a grim reminder to all that the
three years following the ceasefire agreement has not gone beyond
the state of a `negative peace’ or what is called a `No War
No Peace’ syndrome. CPA unequivocally condemns the assassination
and extends our condolences to Mr Kadirgamar’s family. Mr
Kadirgamar was a champion of the unity of Sri Lanka, a just, democratic
and durable peace, and universally recognized as the best Foreign
Minister this country has had. His brutal assassination tragically
underscores the obstacles to making peace in Sri Lanka and the
imperative of addressing them as a matter of the utmost priority.
While
an all-out war was brought to a halt by the ceasefire agreement
more than
three years ago and six sessions of negotiations took
place between the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) and the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) before they were suspended over two
years ago, violations of the ceasefire agreement with a direct
and adverse impact on the state of human rights and human security,
continue unabated. Political killings and child conscription with
impunity, in particular, despite condemnations from civil society
and the international community, have weighed heavily on the peace
process and eroded broad support for even ‘negative’ peace.
In this, the LTTE has to shoulder the primary responsibility just
as much as the assassination of Lakshman Kadirgamar has all the
hallmarks of an LTTE act of terrorism, despite its arrogant denials.
The burden now lies with the GoSL and the investigating authorities
to come out with conclusive evidence that can stand the test
of judicial proceedings and the due process of law. Furthermore,
they must take all measures to apprehend, convict and punish
the perpetrators of this dastardly crime, including the conspirators
and, in particular, those who masterminded it. The fact that
the LTTE is a party to the peace process should not in any way
prevent or impede the investigative and judicial process. And,
the LTTE, if as it claims was not responsible, must surely cooperate
with the investigations rather than “challenge” the
authorities to find the culprits.
In
addition to the above, a primary responsibility lies with the
GoSL and
the LTTE to engage in principled negotiations and to conduct
the peace process in a manner that is sustainable and open to scrutiny.
The battle between State sovereignty and LTTE’s pursuit of
legitimacy and a Tamil Statehood, has relegated to the background
the critical task of finding a just and durable solution to the
Ethnic Question that involves all legitimate stakeholders in the
country and which is based on power-sharing, autonomy, democracy
and human rights.
Unfortunately, the peace process has hardly moved beyond the stage
of the big guns falling silent, while attacks on human rights and
human security continue unabated and with impunity. The peace process
has also not moved beyond the exploration of interim structures
to deal with immediate humanitarian needs to addressing the root
causes of the conflict and to redressing them. We consider the
peace process to be flawed and call on Norway to consider redesigning
it in consultation with the GoSL, LTTE and all legitimate stakeholders
in this country. In this
context we welcome the possibility of the signatories of the Cease
fire Agreement meeting to review it. However, we note that a fundamental
review and redesign of the peace process is crucially necessary.
This
should take into account the need for principled negotiations
to advance
the process to a conclusion, rather than rely on a series
of interim and ad hoc measures. The ultimate responsibility lies
not only with the parties to the conflict and negotiations (i.e.
GoSL, LTTE and Norway) but with all sections of the Sri Lankan
polity and civil society to ensure and guarantee the above. A heavy
burden also lies with the international community, given that the
peace process is heavily internationalized. The international community
has to extend its fullest support to the above process, including,
if need be, sanctions. The Oslo Communiqué and the Tokyo
Declaration we believe, continue to have relevance and should inform
the peace process.
This
is the least that we can do for all those who laid down their
lives, like Lakshman Kadirgamar, for a peace that is based on democracy,
human rights and justice for all.

Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
Executive Director
Centre for Policy Alternatives
(on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Centre for Policy Alternatives)
|